Commonwealth v. LeClair
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtDuffly, J.
A nonimmunized witness in a criminal trial repeatedly refused to answer questions posed by defense counsel concerning his use of illegal drugs on the ground of the privilege against self-incrimination. The prosecutor represented to the witness and the trial judge that the Commonwealth had no intention of pursuing such a prosecution, but when the witness, advised by his attorney, refused to answer, the judge directed the witness to do so. When the witness continued to refuse, the judge found the witness in summary criminal contempt and imposed a sentence of ninety days’ incarceration, which he…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Commonwealth v. KoehlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- United States v. Gondolfo Miranti, United States of America v. Domenico BandoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TewoldeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
- In Re: Grand Jury InvestigationMassachusetts Superior Court · 2020