Legal Opinion

Templar v. State Board of Examiners

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1902No. Calendar No. 19,311PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Mandamus by Arthur G. Templar to compel the State board of examiners of (barbers to permit him to take the examination provided for by law.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Act No. 212 of the Public Acts of 1899 provides for the examination and licensing of barbers. Section 5 provides for the examination of an applicant concerning his ability to prepare and fit for use tools and utensils used by barbers, including the proper antiseptic treatment of razors, etc., and the nature and effect of eruptive and other diseases of the skin and scalp, and whether the same are infectious or communicable, and provides that no person so examined shall receive a certificate of the said board unless he shall appear to be skilled in the use of barbers’ tools, and possessed of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. People v. PhippinMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Ex parte LucasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  4. Trageser v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
  5. State v. ZenoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Moore v. SpanglerMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Salla v. County of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Mayor of Havre De Grace v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
  4. Robison v. Wayne Circuit JudgesMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Alsos v. KendallOregon Supreme Court · 1924

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API