Legal Opinion
Alsos v. Kendall
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 1924PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.
Plaintiff, a resident alien skilled in salmon fishing in the Columbia River, applied to the master fish-warden for a boat-puller’s license, pursuant to Section 135 of Chapter 105, Laws of 1921, as amended by Section 5 of Chapter 295, Laws of 1923, which provides for a license fee of one dollar for each boat-puller engaged in the taking of salmon. His application was denied upon the sole ground that he was not a citizen of the United States.
The Attorney General, appearing on behalf of the defendant fish commissioners and master fish-warden of the state, contends that under Chapter 105, Laws of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Wong Wing v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. Wong Kim ArkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Anthony v. VeatchOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Takahashi v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Columbia River Fishermen's Protective Union v. City of St. HelensOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Berry v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Winston Bros. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1936
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.