Bent Bros., Inc. v. Campbell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
This is an original proceeding instituted by the petitioner herein praying that a writ of mandate be directed to the respondent as auditor of the city of Stockton, to draw a warrant in favor of the petitioner against the city of Stockton for the payment of $70,724.27 alleged to be due the petitioner by virtue of a contract entered into between the petitioner and the city of Stockton for the construction of a flood control dam at a point in the Calaveras River, in the county of Calaveras, east of the city of Stockton. After a few preliminary allegations which we need not mention, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Manigault v. SpringsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Salt Lake City v. Utah Light & Traction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
- Board of Commissioners v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Schaezlein v. CabanissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Department of Public Works v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- City of San Diego v. MillanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Sawyer v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Sinaloa Lake Owners Ass'n v. StephensonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1992
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1990