Legal Opinion

Schaezlein v. Cabaniss

California Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1902No. S.F. No. 2761PublishedCited by 31 opinions

CERTIORARI to the Police Court of the City and County of San Francisco to annul proceedings for the trial, convietion, and judgment of the petitioners. George H. Cabaniss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is certiorari to the police court of the city and county of San Francisco. Petitioners were charged with violating the provisions of “an act to provide for the proper sanitary condition of factories,” etc., approved February 6, 1889. That act -declares as follows: “If in any factory or workshop any process or work is carried on by which dust, filaments, or injurious gases are generated or produced that are liable to be inhaled by the persons employed therein, and it appears to the commissioner of the bureau of labor statistics that such inkalation__could, to a| great extent, be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Health Department v. Rector of Trinity ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Taylor v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Riley v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. People v. Monterey Fish Products Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Sandstrom v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Smith v. PetersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API