Legal Opinion

Watkiss & Saperstein v. Williams

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1996No. 940294PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSON, Justice:

Defendants David and Deanna Williams and Intermountain Broadcasting, Inc. (Inter-mountain), appeal from judgments dismissing their legal malpractice counterclaims against plaintiffs Watkiss & Saperstein (formerly Watkiss & Campbell) and Robert S. Campbell, Jr. (collectively, Watkiss & Campbell). Watkiss & Campbell had represented defendants in preparing and filing a legal malpractice complaint against their District of Columbia lawyers in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. However, the complaint was dismissed by that court on the ground that the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Blannie S. Wilson, Administratrix of the Estate of Henry J. Wilson, Deceased v. Johns-Manville Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  4. Smith v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Ehrenhaft v. Malcolm Price, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Darby & Darby, P. C. v. VSI International, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Beiwei Li v. Shuyu ZhangCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  3. Willey v. BugdenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  4. Cattani v. DrakeCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  5. Bella Monte Owners Association v. Vial Fotheringham LLPDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API