Adamson v. Marianne Fabrics, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Chandler, Justice:
Marianne Fabrics (Marianne) and ADO Corporation (ADO) appeal a jury verdict for actual and punitive damages, and an award of attorney’s fees to Respondent, Bill Adamson (Adamson).
We reverse.
FACTS
In 1979, Adamson was employed to sell drapery fabrics as a sales representative for Marianne and ADO. In 1983, he signed a contract with ADO which characterized him as an Independent Contractor. The contract provided for a 13% commission on ADO fabrics sold, and 6V2% on Marianne fabrics. It also entitled Adamson to 120 days’ commissions upon his termination.
When he was terminated by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Young v. WarrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
- Hofer v. St. ClairSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Chavis v. WatkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
- Wilson v. LandstromCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- South Carolina National Bank v. SilksCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
3Cited by16 opinions
- Concrete Spaces, Inc. v. SenderTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Carolina Alliance for Fair Employment v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing, & RegulationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
- Toyota of Florence, Inc. v. LynchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- King v. PYA/Monarch, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Inman v. Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.