Legal Opinion

Inman v. Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided October 22, 1990No. 1557PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action for fraud. James C. Inman sued Imperial Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. after discovering the car he purchased from Imperial as new previously had been sold to another. Imperial moved for summary judgment on the ground that Inman’s fraud claim was barred since Inman had already received and satisfied an Unfair Trade Practices judgment for the same damages. The trial judge granted the motion. Inman appeals. We affirm.

Inman’s initial complaint stated a claim for Unfair Trade Practices and attempted to state a cause of action for fraud. Imperial moved to dismiss the fraud claim because…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nichols v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  2. Harper v. EthridgeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Save Charleston Foundation v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Adamson v. Marianne Fabrics, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Boardman v. Lovett Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Hoppin' Johns, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Collins Music Co., Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  3. Harbin v. Owens-Corning FiberglasCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Cowart v. PooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Orangeburg Sausage Co. v. Cincinnati InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API