Legal Opinion
South Carolina National Bank v. Silks
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided February 29, 1988No. 1103PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Goolsby, Judge:
South Carolina National Bank (“SCN”) brought these actions on a promissory note and for claim and delivery against the defendants Silks, a South Carolina limited partnership, and against Eric A. Brooks, W. Vaughan Davidson, and Frank E. Fowler as general partners of Silks and in their individual capacities. The defendants answered and counterclaimed for breach of contract and for violation of the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act (“UTPA”). The trial judge directed a verdict for SCN on its claims and on the defendants’ counterclaims. Silks and Fowler appeal. We reverse…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Noack Enterprises, Inc. v. Country Corner Interiors of Hilton Head Island, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Key Co. v. Fameco Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- Hilton Head Island Realty, Inc. v. Skull Creek ClubCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- McPeters v. Yeargin Const. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Sanchez v. TilleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bessinger v. Food Lion, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2003
- Carolina Amusement Co. v. Connecticut National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
- Adamson v. Marianne Fabrics, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Collins & Sons Fine Jewelry, Inc. v. SOUTHEASTERN SECURITY SYS., INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
- Volvo Trademark Holding Aktiebolaget v. CLM EQUIP. COMPANY, INC.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.