Legal Opinion
O'Mara v. Alberto-Culver Co.
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County
Decided February 24, 1966No. A213224PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBettman, J.
This matter is before the court on the motion of one defendant to quash service of summons. Service was properly made in accordance with the provisions of the new “long arm statute,” Sections 2307.382 and 2307.383, Revised Code, which permit service of summons on the Secretary of State together with service by registered mail on manufacturers whose products are alleged to have caused tortious injury in this state even though they do not do business in Ohio.
The defendant admits service was in accordance with the statutes but contends that, since the statutes were not by their terms made…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. New York Central Rd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1930
- Schlagheck v. WinterfeldOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
- Beckman v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1930
- Buckeye Churn Co. v. Abbott.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
- Luff v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by9 opinions
- Busch v. Service Plastics, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1966
- Krueger v. Rheem Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Ritzheimer v. Insurance Counselors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Ratner v. HensleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Bagsarian v. Parker Metal CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.