Legal Opinion

Luff v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1925No. 18700PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The sole question for consideration in this case is that of the right of one convicted of a criminal offense to be sentenced under the law as it existed at the time of the commission of the alleged offense. The facts incident thereto are as follows:

Morris F. Luff was indicted by the grand jury of Cuyahoga county on the 18th day of May, 1923, for the offense of embezzlement. On October 24th of the same year the jury returned a verdict of guilty, and the common pleas court passed the following sentence :

“It is ordered and adjudged by the court that said defendant, Morris F. Luff, be imprisoned…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re LambrechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. HartsigIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  3. People v. MosesIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Francis v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Luff v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Eastern Savings Bank v. Bucci, 08 Ma 28 (12-4-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. O'Mara v. Alberto-Culver Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API