Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Civil Service Employees Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 20, 1973No. Civ. 13345PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JANES, J.
This appeal involves a coverage dispute between a homeowner’s insurance carrier (plaintiff; hereinafter, “Hartford”) and an automobile insurance carrier (defendant; “Civil Service”).
The matter came before us upon a somewhat inconclusive record.. At the heart of the dispute is a claim made by Mrs. Elizabeth Ehrenburg that she suffered personal injury on October 24, 1966. As we hereafter show, her claim was settled by Hartford prior to trial, hence there has been no finding as to the facts underlying her claim. The coverage dispute was submitted to the trial court upon an agreed…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
- Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Continental Casualty Company v. City of Richmond, a Municipal Corporation, and Mead Reinsurance Company, Defendant-In-Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Jarchow v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Central Pathology Service Medical Clinic, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Downey Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Fibreboard Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.