Legal Opinion
Banks v. Office of Senate Sergeant-at-Arms
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 27, 2007No. Civil Nos. 03-56 (HHK/JMF), 03-686 (HHK/JMF), 03-2080 (HHK/JMF)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case was referred to me for full case management. Currently pending before me is Plaintiffs Rule 37 Motion for an Order Precluding Defendant from Offering Testimony Concerning the Subject Matter of Plaintiff’s Rule 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition and Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 612 Request for Documents [# 208] (“Pls.Mot.”). For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiffs motion will be denied in its entirety, and a new scheduling order for briefing of dispositive motions shall be ordered.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Roy Banks…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sharon Bonds v. District of Columbia and Director, District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Poole v. Textron, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Rainey v. American Forest and Paper Ass'n, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Banks v. Office of Senate Sergeant-At-ArmsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Covad Communications Company v. Revonet IncDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Moore v. ChertoffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- S&T Bank v. Daniel Groskop, as Trustee of the Black Diamond Liquidating Litigation TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Lopez v. Timeco Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.