Legal Opinion

United States v. United States District Court for Northern Mariana Islands

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 12, 2012No. 11-72940PublishedCited by 255 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLIFTON, Circuit Judge:

The government has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, requesting that this court vacate four district court orders directing the government to be represented at an initial court settlement conference by a representative with full authority to settle a civil tax refund lawsuit. We hold that the district court has the authority to order parties, including the federal government, to participate in mandatory settlement conferences, but that the exercise of such authority is subject to review for abuse of discretion. Based on the facts of this case, we conclude…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by255 opinions

  1. Chad Barnes v. Sea Hawaii Rafting, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. In re Univ. of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Robert Griffin v. James GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. (PC) Alem v. CDCRDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

250 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API