Legal Opinion

Bishop v. South

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 27, 1994No. 1921868PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Glenda Kay Bishop, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Yvonne South. Sherri Raspberry was also a defendant, and the summary judgment was also in her favor, but Bishop does not appeal as to Raspberry. Bishop was injured when she fell while on South's premises. The issue is whether Bishop presented substantial evidence that South breached her duty to exercise ordinary and reasonable care in providing and maintaining a reasonably safe premises.

On February 1, 1992, Bishop visited The Carousel, a store owned by South and her daughter. Bishop and her three…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Quillen v. QuillenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Bogue v. R & M GROCERYSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Baldwin v. GartmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Collier v. NecaiseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  5. Mann v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte South Carolina Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Prickett v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000
  3. Hutto v. Gold's Gym, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1996
  4. Douglas P. Byrne v. Vera FiskSupreme Court of Alabama · 2023
  5. Hodges v. Wal-Mart Stores IncDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API