Legal Opinion

Bogue v. R & M GROCERY

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 9, 1989No. 87-1575PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

553 So.2d 545 (1989)

Effie BOGUE

v.

R & M GROCERY.

87-1575.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

September 15, 1989.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing November 9, 1989.

Stan Brobston, Bessemer, for appellant.

W.J. McDaniel and Robert S.W. Given of McDaniel, Hall, Conerly & Lusk, Birmingham, for appellee.

2Per curiam 1

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant, R & M Grocery. The plaintiff, Effie Bogue, was injured in a slip and fall accident upon the defendant's premises.

On February 3, 1986, Effie Bogue entered the R & M Grocery to purchase a pack of cigarettes and to cash her husband's…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Per curiam 2.

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Quillen v. QuillenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Tice v. TiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Lamson & Sessions Bolt Co. v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Foodtown Stores, Inc. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  5. Gray v. Mobile Greyhound Park, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by43 opinions

  1. McClendon v. Mountain Top Flea MarketSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Terry v. Life Ins. Co. of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Ex Parte KraatzSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. Breeden v. Hardy Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Edwards v. Intergraph Services Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API