Legal Opinion

Collier v. Necaise

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 11, 1988No. 86-1146PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by plaintiffs, Michael Shane Collier and Russell Collier, from summary judgment for the defendant, Chris Necaise, in plaintiffs' action to recover damages for Shane Collier's personal injuries. We affirm.

The facts are not in dispute. Defendant Necaise is the owner of a convenience store near Bayou La Batre. On September 3, 1985, as Hurricane Elena threatened the Gulf Coast, Necaise loaded the stock of his store onto two trucks owned by a friend, plaintiff Russell Collier (Shane's father), and moved with his family to the Collier home to wait out the storm. The following day, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Quillen v. QuillenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  2. Tice v. TiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Lamson & Sessions Bolt Co. v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Motes v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Gray v. Mobile Greyhound Park, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bishop v. SouthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Fox v. FoxSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  3. Pilkington ex rel. Pilkington v. Peking Chinese Restaurant, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  4. Johnson v. Investment Co. of South, L.L.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  5. ORR BY AND THROUGH ORR v. TurneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API