Legal Opinion

Ex Parte South Carolina Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 14, 1996No. 1950556PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs, Glenda Kay Bishop and Yvonne South, sued for a judgment declaring that they had liability insurance coverage with the defendant, South Carolina Insurance Company, for damages claimed against South by Glenda Kay Bishop in a premises liability case. The complaint alleged that insurance coverage existed under the policy issued to South's tenant, Sherry Rasberry. The trial judge held that coverage existed under the policy, and the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed.South Carolina Ins. Co. v. Bishop, 683 So.2d 985 (Ala.Civ.App. 1995). We reverse and remand.

The facts that led to this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gaston v. AmesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. League v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  3. Smith v. Style Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  4. Cougar Min. Co. v. MINERAL LAND & MIN. CONSULT. INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  5. Cannon v. State FarmSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CTB, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Ex Parte Conference America, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  4. WD Williams, Inc. v. IveySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Austin Apparel, Inc. v. Bank of PrattvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API