Legal Opinion
Yap v. Oceanside Union Free School District
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 2, 2004No. CV 01-5708(DRH)(MLO)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HURLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have initiated this action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for alleged violation of their constitutional rights by a elementary school principal, a school district superintendent and a lunch room monitor. Defendants have submitted a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56. Plaintiffs have filed a cross-motion pursuant to Rule 15(a) for leave to file an amended complaint as to a state law claim. For the reasons discussed infra, the Rule 56 motion is granted and Plaintiffs Rule 15(a) motion is denied.
I. BACKGROUND
In evaluating a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- TC v. Valley Central School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Romero v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- J.E. ex rel. Edwards v. Center Moriches Union Free School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- Carabello v. New York City Department of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Chambers v. North Rockland Central School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.