Legal Opinion

Vale v. Atlantic Coast & Inland Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided September 18, 1953PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Chancellor:

The complaint seeks, alternatively, the specific performance of an agreement to give an option or the appointment of a liquidating receiver. This is the decision on the individual defendant’s motion to dismiss and the plaintiff’s motions for judgment on the pleadings or summary judgment.

Plaintiff, Ruby R. Vale, owns 250 shares of the stock of the defendant, Atlantic Coast and Inland Corporation. The other outstanding 250 shares were owned by the individual defendant, William P. *52Short. Defendant, Short, died after the commencement of this action and his administrator has been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Universal Products Co. v. EmersonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1935
  2. Drob v. National Memorial Park, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1945
  3. Raisler Sprinkler Co. v. Automatic Sprinkler Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Delaware · 1934
  4. Tull v. SmithCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1946

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Michelson v. DuncanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  2. Daniel Cowin v. Charles S. BreslerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. Vale v. Atlantic Coast & Inland Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
  4. Robinson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
  5. Delaware State Troopers Lodge, Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge 6 v. O'RourkeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API