Legal Opinion

Tull v. Smith

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided November 25, 1946PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Vice-Chancellor:

I am required to determine whether the contract alleged in the bill of complaint is sufficiently definite to be specifically enforced.

Complainant filed a bill seeking specific performance of an alleged written contract by which the defendant had agreed to sell certain real estate. The bill alleges that the following contract was executed by the complainant Tull and the defendant Smith:

*348“6.24.46
“Received of
“Albert F. Tull
“2418 Main Rd.
“Elsmere, Del.
“Hand money on purchase price of property located at 2418 Main Road, Elsmere, Delaware at purchase price of $5000.00 (Five…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vale v. Atlantic Coast & Inland Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
  2. Gluckman v. HolzmanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1947
  3. Vale v. Atlantic Coast & Inland Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
  4. Bryan v. MooreCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
  5. Falciani v. ZinszerSuperior Court of Delaware · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API