Legal Opinion
Raisler Sprinkler Co. v. Automatic Sprinkler Co. of America
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided January 4, 1934No. 19PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, C. J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
With respect to the first ground of demurrer, the plaintiff contends that the contract should be so construed as to give a reasonable meaning to all its parts, and not to leave a part of it useless and inexplicable. 2 Williston, Contr., § 619.
Wherefore it argues two questions arise for determination by jury, (1) was the defendant’s refusal to extend the license in good faith, (2) was there reasonable ground for the defendant’s dissatisfaction.
The defendant contends that the subject matter is one involving opinion and judgment, which when…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Nash v. TowneSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Silberschein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Varney v. . DitmarsNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Fleischman v. . FurguesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Antwun Echols, an Individual v. Arthur Pelullo, an Individual Banner Promotions, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Atma v. MunozNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
- Vale v. Atlantic Coast & Inland Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
- Beech Aircraft Corporation v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
- United States v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.