Legal Opinion

Paul Ginsburg v. Horace Stern and Patrick N. Bolsinger

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 18, 1957No. 12052_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Chief Judge.

This is the second time this case has been before us on appeal. On October 26, 1954, the court below dismissed the complaint of the plaintiff-appellant, Ginsburg, on the ground that it failed to state a cause of action. See D.C.1954, 125 F.Supp. 596. Cf. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 12(f), 28 U.S.C. We affirmed the judgment, stating that our decision was made “without regard to the issue as to whether or not Ginsburg * * * [might] maintain * * * [a] suit [under the Civil Rights Acts, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1983, 1985, and 1980] against the Chief Justice * * * or the Prothonotary * * * under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  3. Ginsburg v. SternDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Butcher & Sherrerd v. WelshCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  5. Paul Ginsburg v. Horace Stern and Patrick N. BolsingerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mull v. Colt Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  2. Goldlawr, Incorporated v. ShubertDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Torockio v. Chamberlain Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Parks v. Mr. FordDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Negrich v. HohnDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API