Legal Opinion

Bechtol v. Bechtol

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1990No. 88-1922PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

As noted in the facts above, the court of appeals indicated the basis for its reversal was the trial court’s abuse of discretion in awarding custody to Joseph Bechtol by failing to give proper weight to the fact that Nancy Bechtol was the child’s primary caregiver. Our review of the record leads us to a contrary conclusion.

There is no doubt that in this case either parent would be a fit person for custody of the child involved. A finding for either parent could be premised upon this record. Under R.C. 3109.04, the domestic relations court decides to whom the care, custody and control of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Pasqualone v. PasqualoneOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Charles v. CharlesOhio Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Davis v. FlickingerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Davis v. FlickingerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In re R.M.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Doyle v. Fairfield Machine Co., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Patrick v. Painesville Commercial Properties, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API