Legal Opinion

Davis v. Flickinger

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1997No. 1995-2208PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 415.] DAVIS, N.K.A. BAKER, APPELLEE, v. FLICKINGER, APPELLANT. [Cite as Davis v. Flickinger,

1997-Ohio-260.] Domestic relations—Children—Custody—R.C. 3109.04 requires a finding of a “change in circumstances,” not a substantial change--In determining whether change in circumstances has occurred so as to warrant change in custody, trial judge must be given wide latitude to consider all issues affecting best interests of a child. 1. R.C. 3109.04 requires a finding of a “change in circumstances.” Such a determination when…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Davis v. FlickingerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Miller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Bechtol v. BechtolOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. State v. CrumOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. In Matter of T.M., Ca2007-01-019 (11-13-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. AdamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. EickOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State v. KellyOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API