Legal Opinion

State v. Fried

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 30, 1922No. 25360PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.

An information was filed by the district attorney in this case on May 12,1922, charging that the relator, “on the 15th day of October, in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and twenty-,” “willfully and unlawfully did desert, fail, refuse, and neglect without just cause to support and provide for his wife, Mrs. Henry Fried, she being in necessitous circumstances.”

Defendant was duly arraigned, pleaded not guilty, and his case was regularly set for trial. He was found guilty by respondent judge, and was ordered by the court to pay to the clerk of the court for the support of his wife…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mioton v. BakerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  2. State v. DonziSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
  3. State v. BoettnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  4. State ex rel. Unbehagen v. NephlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  5. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  2. State v. WalterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  3. State v. RomeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  4. State of Louisiana v. Terrence K. BenoitLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. State v. CappoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API