Legal Opinion
Hollie v. Smith
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 28, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2011-0561PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Frederick Hollie, proceeding pro se, has sued his former union, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union 639 (“Union”), as well as his union representative, Anthony Smith, seeking damages resulting from gross negligence, breach of contract, and breach of the duty of fair representation. The Union has moved to dismiss Hollie’s claims, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, the Union’s motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND 1
Hollie was employed by the United Parcel…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Sweis v. United States Foreign Claims Settlement CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Slovinec v. Communications Workers for AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Hollie v. Teamsters Local Union No. 639District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Lance v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.