Legal Opinion
Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 29, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2015-0596PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TANYA S. CHUTEAN, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Roger Williams is a Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) bus operator and a member of the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 689 (‘“Union”). WMATA and the Union are parties to a Collective Bargaining Agreement (“CBA”), and Plaintiff alleges that WMATA violated the terms of the CBA when it accused him of violating its periodic drug testing guidelines and subsequently suspended him. He further alleges that the Union breached its duty of fair representation by failing to take the matter to arbitration and…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ekemezie v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Ekemezie v. Cvs Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Fraternal Order of Police Metro Transit Police Labor Committee, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2017
- Hunter v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Judd v. Service Employees International Union Local 32bjDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.