Dow Jones & Co. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Vice Chief Justice.
The dispositive issue on review is whether a use tax levy on some but not all publications — based on sales price or mode of delivery — is an impermissible burden on rights protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. We answer in the affirmative.
I
THE ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
A
Dow Jones & Company, Inc. [Taxpayer] publishes and daily circulates The Wall Street Journal. The Taxpayer also publishes Barron’s National Business and Finance Weekly, the National Business Em ployment Weekly and The Asian Wall Street Journal Weekly. Most issues of these publications…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Pennell v. City of San JoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Richardson v. Tennessee Board of DentistryTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Colonial Pipeline Co. v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- Strelecki v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Ross v. PetersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Globe Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.