Legal Opinion

Industrial Finishes & Systems, Inc. v. American Universal Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 20, 1986No. 16-82-09939; CA A34241PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover expenses incurred in defending and settling a lawsuit brought against it and defendant Wagner-Spray Tech Corporation (Wagner). From a judgment for plaintiff in the amount of $45,387.63, American Universal Insurance Company (American) appeals. Plaintiff cross-appeals from a judgment in favor of Wagner and against plaintiff. It is unnecessary to reach the cross-appeal unless we reverse on the appeal.

Plaintiff, a retail vendor of industrial equipment, and Wagner, a manufacturer of airless spray guns, were sued by an employe of Willamette Industries who…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Sparling v. Allstate Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. United Pacific/Reliance Insurance v. Horace Mann InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. National Zinc Company v. CombsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Equity Mutual Insurance Co. v. Spring Valley Wholesale Nursery, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Century Indemnity Co. v. Marine Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  3. Industrial Finishes & Systems, Inc. v. American Universal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Port of Portland v. Water Quality Insurance SyndicateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Northwest Agricultural Cooperative Ass'n v. Continental InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API