Black v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
REGINALD W. GIBSON, Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiff, Ronald Black, filed a motion to “seal all records” in this military pay action on May 3, 1991. He argues that the right to inspect and copy judicial records is not absolute, and that courts have supervisory powers over their own records and may, therefore, deny access where they find the use of such records to be “a vehicle for improper purposes.” Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 598, 98 S.Ct. 1306, 1312, 55 L.Ed.2d 570, 580 (1978). Plaintiff further argues that his interest in seeking to seal the records outweighs the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Craig v. HarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Publicker Industries, Inc. v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Amergen Energy Co. Ex Rel. Exelon Generation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Black v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Miller-Holzwarth, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- DNC Parks & Resorts at Yosemite, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Crane Helicopter Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.