Legal Opinion

Miller-Holzwarth, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 7, 1999No. 98-576CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MILLER, Judge.

On April 9, 1999, Miller-Holzwarth, Inc. (“plaintiff’), filed its motion and supporting brief to keep under seal “through the final disposition of any potential appeal,” Plf s Br. filed Apr. 9, 1999, at 2, the court’s opinion issued March 30, 1999, which imposed sanctions on plaintiff and its counsel. Miller-Holzworth, Inc. v. United States, No. 98-576C (Fed.Cl. Mar. 30, 1999). Plaintiff reasons that “[t]here can be no doubt, given the substance and tenor of the Court’s March 30, 1999 opinion, that the public release of that opinion at this time will cause both enormous and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Craig v. HarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Publicker Industries, Inc. v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  4. In Re the Knoxville News-Sentinel Company, Inc., (83-5095). In Re Knoxville Journal Corporation and Tennessee Newspapers, Inc., (83-5096)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. Aerolease Long Beach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Amergen Energy Co. Ex Rel. Exelon Generation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  2. DNC Parks & Resorts at Yosemite, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Crane Helicopter Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  4. Scott v. City of Sioux CityDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2015
  5. Anderson v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API