Legal Opinion

Crane Helicopter Services, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 28, 2003No. 93-322CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HORN, Judge.

The remaining issue before the court is whether certain exhibits and testimony placed into the record under seal during the trial on defendant’s fraud counterclaim should remain sealed to protect the asserted trade secrets of a nonparty, Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. (Bell). Bell and the defendant have submitted a list of those portions of the record they believe should remain sealed. Pursuant to the following discussion, the court finds that most, but not all, of the portions of the record identified by Bell and the defendant constitute trade secrets which should remain…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  4. Craig v. HarneySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Greg Rushford, the Washington Post Company, Intervenor v. The New Yorker Magazine, Inc., and William Shawn Reneta AdlerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Powercorp Alaska, LLC v. Alaska Energy AuthorityAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  2. DNC Parks & Resorts at Yosemite, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  3. Callaway Golf Co. v. Dunlop Slazenger Group Americas, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API