Legal Opinion

Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. Oglesby

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided July 9, 1997No. 466, 1996PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

In this certified question proceeding, we answer the substance of questions of Delaware law on insurance coverage posed to us by the certifying court. We hold that an insurer that does not take advantage of a fraudulent misstatement exclusion in a disability insurance contract, where such exclusion is permissible under applicable Delaware statutes, may not avoid coverage on that ground. In addition, we hold that, where the insurance policy contains one provision that would deny coverage, but makes that provision “subject to” others that could be construed to permit…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Co. v. American Motorists Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. Steigler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  3. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. v. MathesonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  4. Oglesby v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1995
  5. Paul Revere Life Insurance v. HaasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Kuhn Construction, Inc. v. Diamond State Port Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2010
  2. United Rentals, Inc. v. RAM Holdings, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
  3. PHL Variable Insurance v. Price Dawe 2006 Insurance Trust Ex Rel. Christiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2011
  4. SI Management L.P. v. WiningerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  5. Emmons v. Hartford Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API