Legal Opinion

Paul Revere Life Insurance v. Haas

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 26, 1994PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

*195POLLOCK, J.

We granted the petition for certification of plaintiff, The Paul Revere Life Insurance Co. (plaintiff, the insurer, or Paul Revere), 137 N.J. 307, 645 A.2d 136 (1993), to determine whether a statutorily-mandated “incontestability clause” included in a disability policy precludes the insurer from denying a claim when the insured intentionally failed to disclose a disabling disease in the insurance application. We hold that an insured may not recover under a disability insurance policy for a disease that he or she intentionally concealed when…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Voorhees v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  2. Merin v. MaglakiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. Longobardi v. Chubb Ins. Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  4. Matter of Met. Life Ins. Co. v. ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. ManzoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Travelers Indem. Co. v. Dammann & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Jeffrey M. PoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  3. Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. FontaineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. Estate of Doe v. Paul Revere Insurance GroupHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Ledley v. William Penn Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API