Legal Opinion

SI Management L.P. v. Wininger

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 19, 1998No. 457, 1997PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VEASEY, Chief Justice:

In this interlocutory appeal of a preliminary injunction entered by the Court of Chancery, we affirm, finding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion. The underlying question of contract interpretation presented here in the context of a limited partnership agreement is an important one of first impression in this jurisdiction.

On the limited record before the trial court on the motion for preliminary injunction, it appears that the General Partner had entered into a limited partnership agreement with approximately 1,850 limited partners and that the agreement…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rhone-Poulenc Basic Chemicals Co. v. American Motorists Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. Eagle Industries, Inc. v. DeVilbiss Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  3. Kaiser Aluminum Corp. v. MathesonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  4. Emmons v. Hartford Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  5. Klair v. ReeseSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
  2. Emerald Partners v. BerlinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
  3. Intel Corporation v. Via Technologies, Inc., a California Corporation, via Technologies, Inc., a Taiwan Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  4. Sunline Commercial Carriers, Inc. v. Citgo Petroleum CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
  5. Dieckman v. Regency GP LP, Regency GP LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API