Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Bingham & Garfield Ry. Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1950No. 7356PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Justice.

This action was commenced by the appellant, Lloyd C. Anderson, plaintiff below, to recover damages allegedly incurred when the automobile he was driving collided with a train owned and operated by the respondent, Bingham & Garfield Railway Company, defendant below. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as they appeared in the lower court.

The accident occurred at approximately 9:00 p. m. on May 23, 1947, at a point where the defendant’s railroad track crosses U. S. Highway 50, a short distance west of Garfield, Salt Lake County, Utah. There the highway extends in a general…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fleming v. BlandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  2. Fike v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Neary v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Smith v. Norfolk & Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Smith v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Compton v. Ogden Union Ry. & Depot Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Marshall v. Ogden Union Ry. & Depot Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Noe v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  4. Jones v. KnutsonUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Marshall v. Ogden Union Ry. & Depot Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API