Smith v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Associate Justices AVERY and CLARK dissenting, arguendo. The issues submitted to the jury, and the responses, were as follows:
1. Was Joseph Smith killed by the negligence of the defendant? Answer: "Yes."
2. Did the said Joseph Smith, by his own negligence, (730) contribute to his own death? Answer: "Yes."
3. Could the defendant, by the exercise of reasonable care and prudence, have avoided the injury? Answer: "Yes."
4. What damage, if any, is the plaintiff administratrix entitled to recover? Answer: "$1,000."
It was in evidence that the engineer blew the locomotive whistle for the crossing, and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- H. & T. C. R'y Co. v. SympkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- Harlan v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1877
- Isbell v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
- Troy v. Cape Fear & Yadkin Valley RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Attorney General ex rel. Cook v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Rollestone v. Cassirer & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Southern Railway Company, a Corporation v. Frank J. MaddenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- Fairport, Painesville & Eastern Railroad v. MeredithSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co v. CrolyIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Dyerson v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.