Legal Opinion

Smith v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1894PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Associate Justices AVERY and CLARK dissenting, arguendo. The issues submitted to the jury, and the responses, were as follows:

1. Was Joseph Smith killed by the negligence of the defendant? Answer: "Yes."

2. Did the said Joseph Smith, by his own negligence, (730) contribute to his own death? Answer: "Yes."

3. Could the defendant, by the exercise of reasonable care and prudence, have avoided the injury? Answer: "Yes."

4. What damage, if any, is the plaintiff administratrix entitled to recover? Answer: "$1,000."

It was in evidence that the engineer blew the locomotive whistle for the crossing, and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. H. & T. C. R'y Co. v. SympkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Harlan v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  3. Isbell v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  4. Troy v. Cape Fear & Yadkin Valley RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  5. Attorney General ex rel. Cook v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Rollestone v. Cassirer & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Southern Railway Company, a Corporation v. Frank J. MaddenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  3. Fairport, Painesville & Eastern Railroad v. MeredithSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co v. CrolyIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Dyerson v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API