Legal Opinion

Noe v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 6, 1969No. Gen. No. 52,581PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schwartz

Plaintiff brought an action to recover for injuries to person and property sustained in a grade crossing collision in Iowa on September 21, 1953, between a crane driven by the plaintiff and a train operated by the defendant. The claim is based on two counts: (1) common-law negligence, and (2) a violation of the Federal Safety Appliance Act. In a former trial the jury found for the defendant on Count One and the court directed a verdict for the defendant on Count Two. On appeal we reversed and remanded the cause for a new trial. Noe v. Chicago Great Western Ry., 71 Ill App2d 347, 219 NE2d 111.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kisling v. ThiermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  2. Crane v. Cedar Rapids & Iowa City Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Fairport, Painesville & Eastern Railroad v. MeredithSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Hogan v. NesbitSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. Menke v. PeterschmidtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Behrstock v. Ace Hose & Rubber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  2. Sepesy v. Archer Daniels Midland Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. People v. MillanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  4. Department of Registration & Education v. SchmidtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. Sepesy v. Archer Daniels Midland Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API