Legal Opinion
Applybe v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 27, 1929No. 5779PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.
On January 2, 1929, the United States district attorney at San Francisco filed an information charging appellants jointly with removing and concealing 390 cases of whisky with the intent to defraud the United States of the tax imposed thereon by law. Without otherwise pleading, appellants on January 26, 1929, filed in the cause separate verified petitions setting up that the eases or sacks “containing twelve bottles each and the contents thereof” (the nature of which was not stated) had been unlawfully taken from their possession ' by “Federal Prohibition Agents”…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cogen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- United States v. MarescaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
- United States v. HeeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1915
- Weinstein v. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- In re Chin K. ShueDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1912
3Cited by13 opinions
- Louis Sager Hunsucker, Jr. v. Robert L. Phinney, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- New Hampshire Fire Insurance v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- In Re BehrensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- United States v. RosenwasserCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- United States v. GowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.