Legal Opinion
In Re Behrens
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 3, 1930No. 221PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
Why the United States of America, which was not a party to the petition, is named as the appellee on appeal, passes comprehension. But we will assume that we may ignore the failure to issue a citation to the real respondents and may consider them as properly before this court and represented by the United States attorney.
This appeal has been presented in complete oblivion on the part of counsel as to any difficulties in the matter of jurisdiction. We are given no intimation of the theory upon which the petitioner thinks he may maintain this summary…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Maryland v. Soper, JudgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Cogen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Slocum v. MayberrySupreme Court of the United States · 1817
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Raffaele v. Granger, Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- New Hampshire Fire Insurance v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Centracchio v. GarrityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- Truth Seeker Co. v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Evelyn Castleberry and Virginia R. Castleberry v. Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms Division of the Treasury Department of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.