United States v. Hee
District Court, D. New Jersey
Criminal prosecution by the United States against Charles Hee. On petition by defendant to have certain personal property, alleged to have been illegally seized by revenue officers, returned to him.
1Opinion of the Court
HAIGHT, District Judge.
The petitioner claims that his place of business, in the city of Paterson, N. J., was forcibly entered by certain officers, connected with the Treasury Department of the United States, without a warrant of any kind;, that he was arrested without a warrant, lodged in jail, and certain personal property in his place ¿of busi*1020ness seized and taken away. The crime with which he is charged is a violation of section 1 of the act of Congress approved January 17, 1914 (38 Stat. 277, c. 10) entitled “An act regulating the manufacture of ■smoking opium within the United States,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Wise v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. MillsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1911
- United States v. WilsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1908
- In re Chin K. ShueDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cogen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Louis Sager Hunsucker, Jr. v. Robert L. Phinney, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- New Hampshire Fire Insurance v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- In Re BehrensCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Elizabeth G. Austin v. United States of America, James E. Holshouser, United States Attorney for the Middle District of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.