United States v. Gowen
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
The major premise of the appellants’ argument is that the Fifth Amendment protects every person against incrimination by the use of evidence obtained through unreasonable search or seizure in violation of rights secured to him under the Fourth Amendment. This is unassailable. Agnello v. United States, 269 U. S. 20, 34, 46 S. Ct. 4, 70 L. Ed. 145, 51 A. L. R. 409; Marron v. United States, 275 U. S. 192, 194, 48 S. Ct. 74, 72 L. Ed. 231. The minor premise is that the seizure of the papers and documents in suit violated their rights under…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. PollerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- New Hampshire Fire Insurance v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. LindenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- United States v. Manfred SwarovskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.