Legal Opinion

Bepple v. Reiman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1957No. 34220PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This action was commenced by appellant for the purpose of establishing ownership of certain land which he claimed by reason of adverse possession. The cause was tried to the court, which entered judgment dismissing appellant’s complaint.

The facts may be summarized as follows:

For several years prior to 1928, Sigmund Reiman (hereinafter referred to as if he were the sole respondent) owned a tract of land in Grant county. This tract was intersected by the west boundary of the city of Quincy. The easterly portion, located within the corporate limits, was platted property, whereas the remaining…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McAuliff v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Rogers v. CationWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Murray v. BousquetWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Hovila v. BartekWashington Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jacobsen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Peeples v. Port of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Diel v. BeekmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. McPherron v. McAuliffeNevada Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API