Legal Opinion

Hovila v. Bartek

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1956No. 33315PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment wherein plaintiffs were decreed to be the owners of a certain pipeline, which is part of a domestic water supply system, and were given a prescriptive right to maintain the portion of the pipeline which runs through land owned by defendants.

In substance, the facts found by the trial court are as follows: The parties hereto are adjoining property owners. The south portion of respondents’ (the Hovilas) land, hereinafter referred to as tract A, abuts land owned by appellants (the Barteks and the Petersons), hereinafter referred to as tract B. In 1909, A. H.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Northwest Cities Gas Co. v. Western Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Roediger v. CullenWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. In Re the Estate of DandWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Gray v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Brown v. VanTuylWashington Supreme Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Cuillier v. CoffinWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Nickell v. SOUTHVIEW HOMEOWNERS ASS'NCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Timberlane Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. BrameCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  5. Proctor v. HuntingtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API