Legal Opinion

Cramer v. Danielson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1894PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Genesee. (Newton, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action brought under the civil damage law. The declaration alleges .that defendant sold to plaintiff’s minor son, Albert Ehino, two bottles of whisky, on the 5th day of January, 1891, and that the son became intoxicated from the use of the liquor, and *532that the “plaintiff has been caused great shame, mortification, and disgrace as well by the intoxication of her said son as aforesaid as by his forming intemperate habits, for all of which said plaintiff claims both actual and exemplary damages, as provided by section 20, Act No. 313, of the Public Acts of the State of Michigan for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Theisen v. JohnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kelly v. RoetzelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Bailey v. BriggsMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Scahill v. Ætna Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Hink v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Liebler v. CarrelMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API