Legal Opinion

Kreiensieck v. Cook

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1985No. 14791PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

The question presented is whether a deed should be treated, in the circumstances of this case, as an absolute conveyance or as security for the payment of a debt. The district court held the deed to be a security instrument and directed the purported grantee, Frances Cook, to reconvey the property to the original owner, Charles Kreiensieck, now deceased. Mrs. Cook has appealed, raising two issues. First, she argues that the district court erred in admitting parol evidence to explain the parties’ understanding of the intent underlying the deed. Second, she contends that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Faw v. GreenwoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Clinton v. Utah Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Wright v. RosebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Gem-Valley Ranches, Inc. v. SmallIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Dickens v. HestonIdaho Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sowards v. RathbunIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. McGill v. LesterIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. Evans v. BarnettIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State ex rel. Evans v. BarnettIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. McGill v. LesterIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API