Legal Opinion

McGill v. Lester

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 1985No. 14686Published

1Opinion of the Court

700 P.2d 964 (1985)

108 Idaho 561

Earl F. McGILL, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Elmer LESTER and Jane Doe Lester, husband and wife; John Hibnes, Sr. and Jane Doe Hibnes, husband and wife; and John Hibnes, Jr. and Jane Doe Hibnes, husband and wife, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 14686.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

May 30, 1985.

Rehearing Denied June 25, 1985.

Steve Adamson and Henry McQuade (argued), Adamson, Young & McQuade, Nampa, for defendants-appellants.

Merlyn Clark (argued) and Linda L. Holdeman (Hawley, Troxell, Ennis & Hawley), Boise, for plaintiff-respondent.

BURNETT, Judge.

We are asked to decide whether…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rasmussen v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Taylor v. HerboldIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Obray v. MitchellIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Kendrick v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Packard v. Joint School District No. 171Idaho Court of Appeals · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API