Legal Opinion

Clinton v. Utah Construction Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1925PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

This action was brought to have a deed declared a mortgage. For convenience and brevity appellants James E. Clinton and H. H. Henderson will be hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, appellant Union Portland Cement Company as cross-complainant, respondent, Utah Construction Company as defendant, and Corey Brothers Construction Company as Corey Bros. The complaint alleges the corporate existence of defendant and cross-complainant and that Corey Bros, was a Utah corporation authorized to do business in Idaho until the forfeiture of its charter on December 2, 1916, for failure to pay its annual…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Henley v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Voris v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Bergen v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Chapman v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Holmes v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. SnoderlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Wright v. RosebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Gem-Valley Ranches, Inc. v. SmallIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. O'Briant v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Dickens v. HestonIdaho Supreme Court · 1933

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API