Clinton v. Utah Construction Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.
This action was brought to have a deed declared a mortgage. For convenience and brevity appellants James E. Clinton and H. H. Henderson will be hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, appellant Union Portland Cement Company as cross-complainant, respondent, Utah Construction Company as defendant, and Corey Brothers Construction Company as Corey Bros. The complaint alleges the corporate existence of defendant and cross-complainant and that Corey Bros, was a Utah corporation authorized to do business in Idaho until the forfeiture of its charter on December 2, 1916, for failure to pay its annual…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Henley v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Voris v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Bergen v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Chapman v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Holmes v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. SnoderlyIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
- Wright v. RosebaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
- Gem-Valley Ranches, Inc. v. SmallIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- O'Briant v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Dickens v. HestonIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.