Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Tate
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Griffin
This is a suit for recovery of benefits provided in an insurance policy issued to respondent by petitioner. This policy provided for certain benefits to be paid to respondent in the event he was disabled before reaching the age of 60 years. It was stipulated that respondent was under 60 years of age at the time he claimed he became totally and permanently disabled. Upon answer to special issues in favor of respondent by the trial jury, the trial court granted respondent’s motion for judgment on the verdict for the sum of $2,922.00, due under the terms of the policy, and $350.64 as 12% penalty…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Foglesong v. Modern Brotherhood of AmericaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
- Lobdill v. Laboring Men's Mutual Aid Ass'n of ChatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Great Southern Life Ins. Co. v. JohnsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Commonwealth Bonding & Casualty Insurance v. BryantTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- North American Accident Ins. Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Ortiz v. O. J. Beck & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Times Herald Printing Co. v. A.H. Belo Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- American Transfer & Storage Co. v. ReichleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Russell v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.